That would be fantastic.  Perhaps we could branch the 1.8 spec and 1.9
spec so the work can continue on both?

--Jeremy

On Dec 26, 2007 12:52 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter / sun.com> wrote:
>
> Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In message "Re: Ruby 1.9.0 is released"
> >     on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:08:21 +0900, "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally / gmail.com> writes:
> > |
> > |Could you point out some areas that are in dire need of documentation?
> > | I've been wanting to get involved with Ruby core documentation but
> > |haven't had a discrete task list to concentrate on.
> >
> > How about updating doc/NEWS file, and sending patches to
> > <ruby-core / ruby-lang.org> list?  Or we can set up Wiki pages for
> > cooperate documentation writing.
>
> What about spec.ruby-doc.org? It's already got a lot of documentation
> for various aspects of 1.8, and I'd be ecstatic if it could be used as a
> cooperative place to document Ruby 1.9 as well.
>
> - Charlie
>
>



-- 
http://www.jeremymcanally.com/

My books:
Ruby in Practice
http://www.manning.com/mcanally/

My free Ruby e-book
http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/

My blogs:
http://www.mrneighborly.com/
http://www.rubyinpractice.com/