> During the last months I played a little bit with the nightly builds of
> Ruby 1.9, and I did some planned tests, because I'm really waiting for
> the m17n features, that will be in the kernel of Ruby 1.9. I think it is
> a good idea to have a stable Ruby 1.9 for a while, because the
> discussions about future enhancements in respect to Ruby 2 will have a
> practical background when Ruby 1.9 is in use for a while.
>

I must say I too am confused between what will go in 1.9 and what will
have to wait for 2.0. Is there any place where things are nicely
explained?

Diego Virasoro