--nextPart2722717.gYBSXAZJHC
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Quoth Robert Dober:
> On Nov 29, 2007 3:40 AM, MonkeeSage <MonkeeSage / gmail.com> wrote:
> Great idea!
> I would however leave Object alone, and put all code into DirObject.
> Thus DirObject has to explore Object which might be a little bit
> harder and slower, but you definitely do not want to mess with Object,
> right?
> Just a short example of what I have in mind
> __do_metadata("methods"n, do) becomes
>=20
> def DirMethods#add_methods( of_object )
>    of_object.methods ...
>=20
> an_object.dir # which would be distroyed by overloading *very often*
> anyway becomes
>=20
> DirObject.new( an_object ).
>=20
> Cheers
> Robert

Well, it's not like it's *wrong* to mess with object as long as you're not=
=20
overwriting stuff. Or so it seems to me.

Regards,
=2D-=20
Konrad Meyer <konrad / tylerc.org> http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/

--nextPart2722717.gYBSXAZJHC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHTmg9CHB0oCiR2cwRAsm1AKCCfalEMfGyrg2wwBZN71V4GOGplACfZ94K
rb6fle/x9vEyEj2FOjoQGjE=
=//FH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2722717.gYBSXAZJHC--