Hi, Dave,

> From: dave / thomases.com [mailto:dave / thomases.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 8:59 PM

> > My thought was;  eruby and RDtools seems to be the same in the
> > point that these are text formatters which is (Ruby) Script compliant.
> 
> My feeling is that rd should be included because some form of
> documentation generator is needed to keep Ruby successful. Right now,
> English-language documentation for Ruby itself exists, and more is
> becoming available. However, there is virtually nothing available on
> the various libraries that people have written. I'm hoping that if rd
> becomes universal, people will start using it, and we'll fix the
> documentation problem.

(Again and again...) Agreed.

rd should be universal, so RDtools should be packed with
a Ruby package.  install? install-app? install_doc?
AND, we Japanese should try to English-language documentation
if we hope Ruby universal.

// NaHi
My poor English is the biggest problem..