The key phrase was "I am going to do this...". At this point its a only a plan. I, myself, would like to have it right now. But at this time I'm reading and going through the learning curve. However, I definitely want to take an evolutionary approach. Start small and build out from there. Obvious initial steps would be the simple stuff: things like syntax highlighting, code templates, logical code navigation (e.g. by class hierarchy), followed by more intermediate stuff like code completion, pop-up context-sensitive help (i.e. class/method documentation), and then the harder stuff like intelligent refactoring and realtime collaboration. Curt PS If you haven't tried it, take a look at IntelliJ IDEA -- its a Java IDE with the best code-completion and refactoring support I ever had the pleasure of using. -----Original Message----- From: Mikkel Bruun [mailto:mikkel / increment.dk] Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 4:33 AM To: ruby-talk ML Subject: [ruby-talk:27923] Re: Ruby IDE?? What about using Eclipse?? What the status of your development?? need any testers yet ;-) Im using eclipse for my java development right now....very impressed...it got the best features of visual for java, and has somehow manage to leave out all the worst....very nice... Mikkel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt Hibbs" <curt / hibbs.com> To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 1:26 PM Subject: [ruby-talk:27922] Re: Ruby IDE?? What about using Eclipse?? > Open source. > > Curt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Feldt [mailto:feldt / ce.chalmers.se] > Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 4:18 AM > To: ruby-talk ML > Subject: [ruby-talk:27921] Re: Ruby IDE?? What about using Eclipse?? > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Curt Hibbs wrote: > > > I am going to do this. > > > > I wanted to do a 100% Ruby IDE, but Eclipse has so much ready made > > infrastructure already in place that it has seduced me. > > > > Except for a very small core, Eclipse is built up entirely from modular > > plug-ins. My goal would be to create a Ruby interface to the plug-in > > facility. That way all extensions and facilities to support Ruby could be > > written in Ruby. > > > Sounds great. Open-source or commercial? > > Good luck and keep us posted. > > /RobertF > > > >