Xavier Noria wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Jay Levitt wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:00:45 -0500, Trans wrote:
>>
>>> It is possible in a round about way. In Ruby, methods are not first
>>> class objects. (Though to go with Ruby's 100% OOP mantra you would
>>> think they would be, but in any case...) You can make them behave as
>>> such for the most part if you want.
>>
>> Trans, you know I love your work, babe, but you've given a "Microsoft 
>> tech
>> support talking to the guy in the helicopter" answer (or whatever your
>> favorite version of that joke is).
> 
> Hey how's that one :-)

http://www.google.com/search?q=microsoft+support+helicopter+joke

1st link:

http://www.bastichlabz.org/~tigger/TechHumor/mshelicopter.txt

:-)

Cheers,
Peter
___
http://www.rubyrailways.com
http://scrubyt.org