On Nov 12, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Jay Levitt wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:00:45 -0500, Trans wrote:
>
>> It is possible in a round about way. In Ruby, methods are not first
>> class objects. (Though to go with Ruby's 100% OOP mantra you would
>> think they would be, but in any case...) You can make them behave as
>> such for the most part if you want.
>
> Trans, you know I love your work, babe, but you've given a  
> "Microsoft tech
> support talking to the guy in the helicopter" answer (or whatever your
> favorite version of that joke is).

Hey how's that one :-)