On Nov 6, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Gary Wright wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:48 PM, MenTaLguY wrote:
>> I think this is arguably a bug in the scheduler, but it is not
>> easy to remedy in a portable way.
>
> I'd be curious to even see a non-portable way to do this.  I just
> think that the Unix/Posix semantics of time/timers basically
> assumes monotonically increasing ticks.

Maybe I spoke to quickly.  I guess it depends on the types
of timers provided by the OS.  You would have to use something
other than a real-time clock timer.  I'm not sure what semantics
the various Posix timers and/or OS-specific timers have with
respect to the system clock changing.

Gary Wright