Martin DeMello wrote:

> Any sufficiently detailed logo contains an ad-hoc, informally-defined,
> artefact-ridden approximation of half a photograph? :)

Doesn't logo already more or less include a lisp interpreter?

(ps. I'm writing a book called "Butfirst Logo".)

;)

-- 
       vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407