On Oct 30, 8:06 am, "Mikel Lindsaar" <raasd... / gmail.com> wrote:
> From a design point of view, it has a number of flaws and I find it
> washed out and not as beautiful and striking as the exisiting logo.
>
> I read through the comments on the website... aisde from the
> unconstructive, inane slander which is unneeded, the professional
> negative comments about sum up my view on this logo.
>
> My 2c.
>
> I think it could be improved with a bit of touch up.

You know all it really needs is for the background to be lighter and
the foreground to have "popping-out" contrast --richer color, perhaps
a little shadow. Then I think it would be pretty nice.

T.