On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:48 PM, mortee wrote:

>>
>> You're right. I never stop for a second thought about the gem's name.
>> Maybe I choose some cryptic name where there is no chance of
>> collision.
>
> I haven't intended to suggest a cryptic name - just something more
> specific to what your gem actually does.


http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/ruby-bsearch/

a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama