On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:48 PM, mortee wrote: >> >> You're right. I never stop for a second thought about the gem's name. >> Maybe I choose some cryptic name where there is no chance of >> collision. > > I haven't intended to suggest a cryptic name - just something more > specific to what your gem actually does. http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/ruby-bsearch/ a @ http://codeforpeople.com/ -- we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being better. simply reflect on that. h.h. the 14th dalai lama