On Oct 29, 2007, at 4:28 PM, mortee wrote:

> James Edward Gray II wrote:
>> * If we fail to find a text/plain part, the gateway will keep the  
>> body
>> as is, but force the content-type of the message to text/plain in the
>> hopes of getting the content through with some noise (it seems  
>> this will
>> be needed for very few messages, possibly none)
>
> Do you think *anyone* would ever attempt to read a post which would  
> show
> its html source as plain text (that will happen if you force the
> content-type of a html mail to text/plain)? I guess you should either
> drop those or try to strip the html tags.

You make a good point.  I was hoping the formatting would be minimal,  
but who knows.

I just checked and the gateway's server has lynx on it.  Can we strip  
with that?

Maybe we should just drop these.  Again, I can't find any recent  
messages like this.

James Edward Gray II