James Edward Gray II wrote:
> * If we fail to find a text/plain part, the gateway will keep the body
> as is, but force the content-type of the message to text/plain in the
> hopes of getting the content through with some noise (it seems this will
> be needed for very few messages, possibly none)

Do you think *anyone* would ever attempt to read a post which would show
its html source as plain text (that will happen if you force the
content-type of a html mail to text/plain)? I guess you should either
drop those or try to strip the html tags.

mortee