James Edward Gray II wrote: > * If we fail to find a text/plain part, the gateway will keep the body > as is, but force the content-type of the message to text/plain in the > hopes of getting the content through with some noise (it seems this will > be needed for very few messages, possibly none) Do you think *anyone* would ever attempt to read a post which would show its html source as plain text (that will happen if you force the content-type of a html mail to text/plain)? I guess you should either drop those or try to strip the html tags. mortee