Luis Parravicini wrote:
> On 10/29/07, mortee <mortee.lists / kavemalna.hu> wrote:
>> Sorry but I guess the gem's name is somewhat inadequate. This is not a
>> binary search library, but a text indexing and searching library which
>> happens to employ a binary search algorithm. So you essentially reserve
>> this gem name from some possible real binsearch library...
> 
> You're right. I never stop for a second thought about the gem's name.
> Maybe I choose some cryptic name where there is no chance of
> collision.

I haven't intended to suggest a cryptic name - just something more
specific to what your gem actually does.

mortee