"Tom Machinski" <tom.machinski / gmail.com> writes:

> On 10/28/07, Yohanes Santoso <ysantoso-rubytalk / dessyku.is-a-geek.org> wrote:
>> The other thing you can play with is using sqlite as the local (one
>> per app server) cache engine.
>
> Thanks, but if I'm already caching at the local process level, I might
> as well cache to in-memory Ruby objects; the entire data-set isn't
> that huge for a high-end server RAM capacity: about 500 MB all in all.

Caching to in-memory ruby objects does not automatically confer the
smartness you was describing. The sqlite is for the smartness.

I think Ara T Howard in the other thread was quite spot-on in
summarising your need.

YS.