------art_3585_25788905.1193245220409
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I've thrown something together that uses KirbyBase (flat text ruby DBMS) as
the back end.  Let me know if that interests you.

This does NOT support transactions.

/Shawn

On 10/15/07, Eric Hodel <drbrain / segment7.net> wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 09:29 , Alex V. Breger wrote:
> > In the current version of Ruby
> > (http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/trunk/lib/rinda/tuplespace.rb)
> > Rinda::TupleBag is implemented with hash by tuple size and then
> > with array.
> > This realization is simple and fast on very small amount of data (e.g.
> > on writing), but
> > scales very bad in reading and searching.
> >
> > How can it be rewritten?
>
> I have heard of attempts at backing TupleSpace with a database, but
> I've not heard of any being completed.
>
> > May be other realizations of tuplespaces are more scalable and fast?
> > Is there any attempts to make faster the standard version?
>
> In ruby, not to my knowledge.
>
> --
> Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
> best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars
>
>
>
>

------art_3585_25788905.1193245220409--