> From: rhkramer / gmail.com
>
> (Richard Stallman considers free licenses without copyleft
> to be non-free.)
...
>
> With a license like the MIT (and BSD, and ...) you give away your software
> (almost) unconditionally...
...
> With a license like the GPL, your software gift is conditional--the receiver
> of the gift must (to use a phrase that I haven't heard in this context
> before) "pay it forward". 

Which one gives the user more freedom, the unconditional or conditional grant?
That's rhetorical.   I've already determined the answer for myself. 

While GPL software apparently does fall under the OSD , it does impose a practical though not explicit discrimination against a particular field of endeavor... selling software. 

- J. Lambert

_________________________________________________________________
Boo! ¨Βγαςε αχαω χοςνσ¬ φιςυσεαξσο νυγθ νοςεΤςΧιξδοχΜιφε ΟξεΓαςε‘