On 10/7/07, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux / polytechnique.org> wrote:
> > Delegation does not mean duck typing.  You are confusing your
> > terminology.
> Tell me if I'm wrong, but from a type point of view, delegation is only
> usable in the context of duck-typing. If you don't think as 'my type is
> defined as what messages I'm able to answer to', then you cannot replace
> one object with one delegator since they won't have the same type.

It's possible to use delegation with non-dynamic languages. Hard, but possible.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com * http://www.halostatue.ca/
               * austin / halostatue.ca * http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/
               * austin / zieglers.ca