Greg Willits wrote:
> I've put together this
> little outline, but the results always come back in order when I believe
> useing sleep should randomize them, so I'm suspicioius that I'm not
> really getting async processing out of my code.

Oh wait, they're in order because that's the order I have them inserted 
into @results. Duh.

I confirmed async by putting a timer wrapper around the whole thing, and 
indeed it completes in less time than the sum of each task's pause time.

-- gw
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.