On 28/09/2007, ara.t.howard <ara.t.howard / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
>
> > That looks very useful. I'm not sure "leak" is the term I
> > would use, since the objects are reachable. Unused reachable
> > objects can be just as much of a problem as unreachable objects, of
> > course.
> >
>
> agree.  we seem to be the minority though ;-(
>

Are there any unreachable objects in Ruby? They should be collected
and go away eventually. So what I am left with is a gigabyte of
reachable objects ... time to optimize space I guess.

Thanks

Michal