David A. Black wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, SpringFlowers AutumnMoon wrote:

>>  if 3.in [3,2,1]
> 
> The include? way is the usual way. Hal Fulton at one point proposed an
> in or in? method that would essentially be:
> 
>    class Object
>      def in?(collection)
>        collection.include?(self)
>      end
>    end
> 
> but I don't think it's on the radar for being added.


Hm... wouldn't that be handy...

i just sort of think that, if you ask me, "have you been to [Hawaii, 
China, France]", i probably should be able to look at each one and tell 
you an answer of yes or no, instead of asking [Hawaii, China, France] to 
tell whether they have seen me.


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.