Xavier Noria wrote:
> I guess the claim that well-defined infinite Ranges in Ruby are
> implementable is now clear.

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but couldn't you just have proved that
claim by giving 1..(1.0/0) as an example? That's an infinite range right
there and you don't have to define any custom classes. Or would you
say that doesn't qualify as well-defined?


-- 
Jabber: sepp2k / jabber.org
ICQ: 205544826