August Lilleaas wrote:
> I got this idea of a sort of neat syntatic sugar of bang (foo!) and
> question (foo?) methods. Take a look at this pastie:
> http://pastie.caboo.se/98638

http://pastie.caboo.se/98672
You could implement something similar for ?-methods, but I don't see the 
point. If you have a method foo! you almost always have method foo that
does the same thing without changing the object - that's hardly the case
for foo? methods.


HTH,
Sebastian
-- 
Jabber: sepp2k / jabber.org
ICQ: 205544826