2007/9/8, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale / gmail.com>:
> Just to try to crystalize my own thoughts about this in general. I'm
> concerned that because of the dynamic nature of "assembling" the
> pieces of a Ruby program, some of these proposals might lead to
> indeterminate  (or at best mysterious) results because of the
> difficulties in figuring out the order of code parsing/execution. (...)

Rick, I don't see a way to solve this problem. If you add around
methods to an existing method, the order in which you do this is
always important, regardless of the syntax or the implementation,
isn't it?

Regards,
Pit