matz / netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

> Hi,
> 
> In message "[ruby-talk:02647] Re: Ruby Toplevel"
>     on 00/05/09, Dave Thomas <Dave / thomases.com> writes:
> 
> |True enough. What I'm trying to illustrate though is how that binding
> |gets set up. It would be nice to be able to say something like:
> 
> Bindings can only be used for the optional second argument of eval().

Agreed, but using a binding is cheating, because I wanted to show the
readers how the binding came into existence--what the interpreter does 
to establish it.

In the end, it's not too important (I hope). I think I can just
explain it all in words.


Thanks


Dave