On Aug 14, 2007, at 21:46, Roger Pack wrote:
> David -- wrote:
>> Ruby seems to be lacking in its documentation of sockets, unless I'm
>> just looking in the wrong places. I hadn't seen anything about the
>> Socket::recv method. Thanks for all the help though, everyone.
> I agree--I wish Ruby had a comprehensive documentation+wiki (or
> documentation with comments).  Anyone want to help with that one? :)

See ruby-doc.org and the mailing list at ruby-doc / ruby-lang.org.

The best way to contribute to documentation is submit RDoc patches.

--
Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars