On Aug 14, 2007, at 21:46, Roger Pack wrote: > David -- wrote: >> Ruby seems to be lacking in its documentation of sockets, unless I'm >> just looking in the wrong places. I hadn't seen anything about the >> Socket::recv method. Thanks for all the help though, everyone. > I agree--I wish Ruby had a comprehensive documentation+wiki (or > documentation with comments). Anyone want to help with that one? :) See ruby-doc.org and the mailing list at ruby-doc / ruby-lang.org. The best way to contribute to documentation is submit RDoc patches. -- Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars