Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela / cinnober.com> wrote:
> Normally there's no need to access foo_wrap shared object. But now I got
> another idea and the question remains, could there be a use for wrapped
> libraries?
> 
> Can you imagine program barrel.c using some routines from foo_wrap.c
> directly? Or how about embedded Ruby programs? Could they possess some need
> to 'ld -lfoo_wrap'?

foo_wrap.c contains only wrapper code.  Wrapper code is almost
useless without Ruby interpreter.  So I can imagine no barrel.c.

I agree wrapped libraries are useful for embedded Ruby programs.


Masaki Fukushima