< :the previous in number
^ :the list in numerical order
> :the next in number
P :the previous (in thread)
N :the next (in thread)
|<:the top of this thread
>|:the next thread
^ :the parent (reply-to)
_:the child (an article replying to this)
>:the elder article having the same parent
<:the youger article having the same parent
---:split window and show thread lists
| :split window (vertically) and show thread lists
~ :close the thread frame
.:the index
..:the index of indices
Markus Jais wrote:
> I have some of these "in 21 days" or "in 24 hours" books
> and most of them are really good. the title is stupid but
> it does not mean that the book is but
I have to admit I didnt read any of those, but I know that the java-book of
those cant be good.. in de.comp.lang.java they regularly make fun of it,
cos so many newbies come and ask about stupid things the book says, and all
we can reply then is: "dont seek for a sense in this formulation -- there
is none".
besides: learning to program in 21 days is quite an illusion, thats faking.
but ok, if you say ruby in 21 days is good, ill have to believe it, though:
im afraid...
regards,
nick
--
"I never fail to convince an audience that the best thing they could do
was to go away."