Conrad writes:

	>Is irb "officially" a "standard" module now? (Substitute
	>more appropriate terms where applicable.)
	>
	>I would like to see something like "rubysh" that is installed with
	>ruby and which starts up ruby with irb.

I think that'd be a great idea, we just need to get here from
here.

	>PS: Is the ruby-ML to comp.lang.ruby gateway ready to run?

FWIW, comp.lang.ruby hasn't shown up here yet.

/\ndy