On Jul 20, 2007, at 1:05 PM, John W. Kennedy wrote: > No, the 7070, 7072, and 7074 were follow-ons to it. > > The IBM pre-360 commercial lines (-> incompatible; => compatible): > > The main scientific line > 701->704=>709=>7090=>7094=>7094 II > | > .->7040=>7044 > (The 7040 line was a cheaper subset of the 7090 line. It did /not/ > derive directly from the 704, as some have incorrectly concluded > from the number.) > > The famous STRETCH supercomputer. Not truly a failure, but IBM lost > money on it when they gave refunds because it wasn't as good as > promised. Still, a lot of STRETCH concepts, reworked, went into the > 360. > 7030 > > Budget scientific and real-time. > 1620=>1710 > (The 1710 was a 1620 with command-and-control extras. There was > also a one-off 1720.) > > The main business line. > 702->705=>705 II=>705 III=>7080 > > Cheaper business machines (and upward extensions). > 1401=>1460 > | | > | .->1440 > | > .->1410=>7010 > (The 1440 was an almost-compatible cheaper version of the 1401; the > only incompatibility was in the handling of punched cards and > printing. The 1410 was an incompatible upward extension of the > line; machine code was different, but carefully written assembler > code could be portable. Two more systems in the line were the 1240 > and the 1420, which were essentially 1401s with magnetic-ink reader/ > sorters in the same chassis.) > > The first machine with a disk for business. Existing systems with > added disks were more successful. > 350 > > Budget general-purpose machines. > 650->7070=>7072=>7074 > > Almost a PC. Too little and too late to get much of a market. > 610 That's pretty complete. I've never read a history of IBM -- I was going entirely from my memory of working with early IBM computers and the oral tradition transmitted me by the many IBM employees I have known over the years. BTW, you omitted the 1130, which I remember as small scientific/engineering machine roughly contemporary with the 1620. But we seem to have determined my memory isn't to be trusted. So where do you place the 1130? Regards, Morton