just for fun
:)

if only keywords could be overwritten.
I guess I could just rebuild the parser.

anyway,
thanks for your suggestions,
back to work

Mj

Daniel Lucraft wrote:
> Matthew Rudy wrote:
>> that's cool,
>> but can we not redefine the default "if"
> 
> Don't think so: 'if' is a keyword. You'll never get it to look for a 
> method called 'if' without rewriting the interpreter.
> 
>> if false
>>   return "false is true"
>> end
> 
> Is there a reason for all this or are you just amusing yourself? :-)
> 
> Dan


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.