On Jul 19, 2:45 am, dbl... / wobblini.net wrote:
> Hi --
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Trans wrote:
> > I think I've come up with a good alternative that is safer, but still
> > reads well (as of 1.9):
>
> >  arr.map.x + 3
>
> > What do you think?
>
> I'm afraid there's too much "invisible ink" there for me.

Well, what does that mean? Clearly you find it uncomfortable in some
manner. Is it just the magic-dot again? Or something else? Is the
original

  arr.map + 3

okay? Or are both too much "invisible ink". What is wrong with it/them
more concretely?

Thanks,
T.