On 7/18/07, aidy.lewis / googlemail.com <aidy.lewis / googlemail.com> wrote: > I have been running the Test_Suite_1.rb from a batch file > > system "test_suite.bat" > system "test_suite.bat" > > But I a unable to keep the value of @@j (in test_data.rb) between the > system calls, so as to use the next set off data in the array. > > Thanks > > Aidy Hi, I have looked at the code, but I haven't found a nice solution :( That said, you can run your class by require 'test/unit/testsuite' require 'test/unit/ui/console/testrunner' class TS_MyTests def self.suite suite = Test::Unit::TestSuite.new suite << Test_Suite_1.suite suite << Test_Suite_1.suite return suite end end Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(TS_MyTests) It won't help you as @@test is set only once - when the class is defined. I wonder why do you use Test::Unit, when you barely use its features (by that I mean especially no asserts in the code). If it is indeed the case (no hidden asserts somewhere in the unpublished code), it might be easier to run your cases by your code. Another way how to solve it would be to create custom TestSuite, that would set the data and call the test case. class RepeatingTestSuite < Test::Unit::TestSuite def initialize(count=1, name="Unnamed TestSuite") super(name) @count = count end def run(result, &progress_block) # set your data here @count.times do super end end def size return @count * super end end class TS_MyTests def self.suite suite = RepeatingTestSuite.new(2) suite << Test_Suite_1.suite return suite end end Another thing that came to my mind is that you can solve your xml-saving problem by creating a custom runner, that will store the results into xml instead of printing to console. Then, you might consider storing your data directly in an array of hashes, or in the separate YAML file, though I don't know why you did this way - where the data comes from etc. Now, you have a little bug, when you advance @@j by1 when you should by 3 Finally, consider declaring creating object for one data set, and a special container for all the sets. That should clear your design at least bit. If you add "each" method to your container you can write your run method as: def run(result, &progress_block) container.each do |data| $current_data = data super end end Global variable is a dirty hack and should be avoided, but I cannot think of a better solution now. BTW. using a lot of @@ class variables is a mark of a bad design IMHOI... not always, but usually. Maybe splitting into more classes will help. And have a look at test/unit sources if you haven't done already...there's much more info that in the docs. Most of the code is easy, except that throw/catch part in the TestCase ;-) HTH, Jano