On 7/14/07, Chad Perrin <perrin / apotheon.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 09:16:35PM +0900, Robert Dober wrote:

> I wasn't even aware that "foo = gets; foo.chomp!" would be more efficient
> than "foo = gets.chomp" -- that's news to me, and I'm not sure I get why
> that should be the case at the moment.

My bad, I thought it was
foo = foo.chomp vs. foo.chomp!
sorry

Robert