On Jul 11, 2:37 am, "Robert Dober" <robert.do... / gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/11/07, dbl... / wobblini.net <dbl... / wobblini.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > Is the word "accept" being used for anything?
> > $ ri Proc#accept
> > Nothing known about Proc#accept
>
> > Doesn't look like it :-)
>
> Too bad because I could not accept accept ;)
> Seriously, accept what, to be run?
> Well if you native speakers think it is good, I will shut my mouth,
> but it really sounds strange to me.

This native-English speaker concurs: "accept" is not at all a good
method name for a block/proc to say "please run yourself". Better I
think is (as I already posted) "run". :) It's both short and
representative.