What kind of modifications are you looking into?


Aur

On 7/8/07, Ari Brown <ari / aribrown.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2007, at 11:21 PM, Sharon Phillips wrote:
> > Do you mean something like this (example below)?
> > What you should be aware of is that Ruby doesn't require you to
> > cast objects to a particular type in order to call a method. You
> > may have a number of objects of completely different classes in
> > your collection, and as long as they all respond to the method
> > you're interested in then you can iterate through and call that
> > method (duck typing). This makes interfaces redundant and is a
> > fantastically useful feature.
> <snip>
>
> Not quite. What I mean is is there a way to make Ruby actually modify
> the code?
>
> ~ Ari
> English is like a pseudo-random number generator - there are a
> bajillion rules to it, but nobody cares.
>
>
>