On 6/23/07, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown / gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/23/07, dblack / wobblini.net <dblack / wobblini.net> wrote:
>
> > The goal of #singleton_class, though, would be to un-hide the
> > singleton class, so #class would be free to report on the "birth
> > class" relieved of any responsibility to worry about the singleton.
>
> +1, I think having #singleton_class removes any ambiguity of what #class is.
Kernel#singleton_class really looks fine to me, once we have this, we
will include the singleton class into its own ancestors array of
course, right?
Just a little reminder ;).

Robert

-- 
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw