John N. Joyner wrote:
> Is there a significant performance difference between these two ways to
> call a method?
> (a) Define the method in a module, then call it with
> MODULE_NAME::METHOD_NAME
> (b) Define the method in a class, then instantiate an object from the
> class, then call the method with OBJECT_REFERENCE_VAR.METHOD_NAME
> 
> Purely for the convenience in naming methods, I'd love to do everything
> in classes, but I can't help suspecting that performance will suffer
> somewhat if I instantiate objects when not really necessary.
Apologies! I had meant to start a new thread.
- John


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.