Hi --

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Rick DeNatale wrote:

> On 6/21/07, dblack / wobblini.net <dblack / wobblini.net> wrote:
>
>> As for singleton classes: I still strongly root for
>> Kernel#singleton_class.
> ...
>> And it all falls into place except that you
>> have to go through the class << self; self; end thing to get at the
>> class, and that makes it feel like a second-class (ha ha) citizen.
>
> To me it feels like I'm hiding out in the High School boy's room with
> a cigarette.  <G>

It's interesting, though, that Matz's reason for not adding K#s_c is,
I think, concern about the name of the singleton class (as opposed to
wanting it to be obscure).  Hopefully that will be clarified in 2.0.


David

-- 
* Books:
   RAILS ROUTING (new! http://www.awprofessional.com/title/0321509242)
   RUBY FOR RAILS (http://www.manning.com/black)
* Ruby/Rails training
     & consulting:  Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypal.com)