MenTaLguY wrote:
> And, here's my second one, written in a subset of Ruby which corresponds
> to a pure (though strict) lambda calculus, building up numbers, strings,
> and everything else entirely from scratch.  (Okay, I cheated a little
> bit for actual IO)
> 
> Sadly Church numerals are very slow for non-tiny numbers, and Ruby
> doesn't do tail recursion optimization which just makes matters worse.
> But it does work, given enough time and stack space.  Try running it and
> see how high you can get!

Ok, you're hired. Your first project is to write a web server in Malbolge.

-- 
       vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407