On 6/3/07, Joshua Ballanco <jballanc / gmail.com> wrote: > > Oh, and just to clarify my earlier suggestion of a 56 chr random code > generator...my rough guestimate is that it would take all the computers Ah, but another approach which might get there faster is to start with a working small solution and then randomly mutate it until a shorter correct solution was found. -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/