On 6/3/07, Joshua Ballanco <jballanc / gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Oh, and just to clarify my earlier suggestion of a 56 chr random code
> generator...my rough guestimate is that it would take all the computers

Ah, but another approach which might get there faster is to start with
a working small solution and then randomly mutate  it until a shorter
correct solution was found.

-- 
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/