```my first solution:
(1..100).each do |n|
print :Fizz if (n % 3) == 0
print :Buzz if (n % 5) == 0
print n if (n % 3) != 0 and (n % 5) != 0
print "\n"
end

and my second one:
(1..100).each { |n| puts n % 3 == 0 ? n % 5 == 0 ? :FizzBuzz : :Fizz :
n % 5 == 0 ? :Buzz : n }

2007/6/1, Ruby Quiz <james / grayproductions.net>:
> The three rules of Ruby Quiz:
>
> 1.  Please do not post any solutions or spoiler discussion for this quiz until
> 48 hours have passed from the time on this message.
>
> 2.  Support Ruby Quiz by submitting ideas as often as you can:
>
> http://www.rubyquiz.com/
>
> 3.  Enjoy!
>
> Suggestion:  A [QUIZ] in the subject of emails about the problem helps everyone
> if you can.
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> There has been some debate on the proper ways to screen programmers you intend
> to hire.  A common theory is that you really need to have the programmer write
> some code for you to accurately gauge their skill.  Exactly what to have them
> write is another debate, but the blogosphere has recently been abuzz with this
> question as a screener:
>
>         Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100.
>         But for multiples of three print "Fizz" instead of the
>         number and for the multiples of five print "Buzz". For
>         numbers which are multiples of both three and five
>         print "FizzBuzz".
>
> Pretend you've just walked into a job interview and been hit with this question.
> Solve it as you would under such circumstances for this week's Ruby Quiz.
>
>

```