Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> 
> s/proper solution/expected results/
> 
> And 59 isn't bad, I should think :P
> 
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net

Thanks. I'd push it a bit further, but I think I've already wasted 
enough time golfing. This has gotten me thinking though...

Mathematically speaking, finding the shortest/optimal solution to any 
programming challenge is an NP problem. It might be fun to do a follow 
up quiz where the goal is to write a code generator that can find the 
elusive 56 byte golfing solution to the FizzBuzz quiz. If one were to 
simply write a random ASCII string generator and test every possible 56 
byte string, it would take less than 95^56 (or 5.656e110) iterations...

...or would that quiz be too hard?

;)

-Josh

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.