On May 28, 6:55 am, Robert Klemme <shortcut... / googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 27.05.2007 20:04, Robert Dober wrote:
> >> Um...  It's really not that difficult.
> > Sure it is, actually the code is simple, I still try to grasp what is
> > wanted here, you see?
> >> Hope that explains it.   If not, let me know.
> > Well see above but never mind :)
> > Thx for your time, I shall probably say what I think about all of this:
> > (a)
> > return v if ((v = 42) % 2).zero?
> > would be nice if it worked
> > (b)
> > I am against fancy enhancements that are purely for optimization but see
> > above.
>
> We are completely on the same page with this.

I concur. From what I understand, this _will_ eventually work:

  return it if ((it = 42) % 2).zero?

And that's quite enough, IMHO.

(The iterator var on the other hand...)

T.