James Britt (rubydev) wrote:


> I suspect there's a formal API def somewhere (would have to look)


please do do.

>  XML is not a standard,


I didn't say so.

> it's the recommendation of a vendor
> consortia.


Sure. a specification.


>>A RubyWay equivalent for both concepts sure would offer many advantages.
>>(as many report from practical experience)
>>
> 
> True, but it doesn't explain why the its presence means excluding DOM and/or SAX.


It doesn't.

Tobi

-- 
Tobias Reif
http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.xhtml

go_to('www.ruby-lang.org').get(ruby).play.create.have_fun
http://www.pinkjuice.com/ruby/