On 12.04.2007 17:58, MenTaLguY wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:05:05 +0900, Robert Klemme <shortcutter / googlemail.com> wrote:
>> But what do we gain by this?
> 
> Eh, a little bit of correctness, I guess.  It's probably best if the parser can handle anything which is syntactically valid Ruby, even if it's a bit dumb.

I think it's worth the effort only if a) it really accepts "unlimited" 
cases and b) it doesn't cost performance.  (Haven't checked either)

> (an alternative would be to actually have an explicit limit on the number of 'when' or 'rescue' branches in the grammar)

Yep.

	robert