I am currently writing programs in Ruby, Java and WSH. To me one program is
usefully.

Just keep '=begin' & '=end'  in Ruby, it is a great way to block out code.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Nobis" <stefan / snobis.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>; <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 09:44
Subject: [ruby-talk:24658] Re: kill rdtool?


> TAKAHASHI Masayoshi <maki / open-news.com> writes:
>
> >  * Can doxygen parse RD?  RD seems to be simple, but it's
> >    pseudo-simple and human-oriented :-)
>
> No (and i don't think, it will be able to in future even if it would be
> doable), because it is in syntax more like javadoc or doc++ (but far more
> powerful).
>
> Also i'm not very happy with RD, because you habe much information doubled
> (i.e. you need to explizitly write class names, method names and the
like),
> which is not neccessary with tools like javadoc or doxygen, because they
not
> only parse their comments but also parse the program-code an extract
> information from that.
>
> >  * rdtool is written in Ruby, so we can extend it in Ruby.
> >    Some people write original Visitor to handle RD articles.
> >    Can we do the same things with doxygen?
>
> As far as i know, for doxygen is planned to have an Intermediate Language
like
> XML to interanally represent the parsed files which than could be put in
some
> post-processors (more or less integrated with doxygen).
>
> --
> Until the next mail...,
> Stefan.


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com