M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Ruby/Tk is very stable and works on most platforms. It's not "native
> looking", and the Ruby/Tk documents mostly say, "see the Perl/Tk
> documents for more detail on the widgets". But it's probably the closest
> to a "universal" Ruby GUI that you'll find.

Check out http://tktable.sourceforge.net/tile/ for a tk extension that 
uses 'native widgets' on Windows/Unix/OSX. I'm developing a project at 
work using ruby/tk/tile and it works great. I've had the application 
running on linux, freebsd, netbsd, dragonflybsd, solaris and windows 
2000. I'll be testing windows XP and OSX eventually too, but I don't 
expect many problems.

It's also not got the 'you must make all your code GPL' thing going on, 
which, along with qt being a heavier toolkit, were the main reasons I 
avoided it for a commerical application. I would have used ruby/gtk but 
gtk doesn't work worth a damn on a mac.

It doesn't look beautiful, but it looks better than raw tk.

Andrew

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.