Daniel DeLorme wrote:
> Austin Ziegler wrote:
>>> an OODB can therefore be relational.
>>
>> Wrong. This is completely backwards. The relational model can
>> *certainly* model an object graph; an object graph is not thereby
>> automatically relational. You're assuming that "a therefore b" also
>> means "b therefore a" and that just ain't the case at all.
> 
> I think *you* have it backwards. All relational models can be expressed 
> with an object graph but not all objects graphs can be expressed with a 
> relational model. 
Have you got an example?

-- 
Alex