On Wednesday 07 November 2001 11:16 am, you wrote:
> You can argue that "it doesn't matter" or "everyone does it" but that will
> not change the reality that GPL is a big problem.  This is not an academic
> issue.  Most non-linux based companies will never touch a GPL license.
> Companies avoiding Ruby is a serious practical problem, no matter what the
> legal arguments are.
>
> P.S.  It is not polite to claim you have the "final word" on a topic of
> open discussion.  That is an attempt to hamper discussion.

As vs. grinding ideological axes?

We're supposed to be engineers. We're supposed to be evaluating things based 
on concrete criteria, not on ideology. Regarding non-Linux companies, I have 
only worked for one Linux company in my entire career (Linux Hardware 
Solutions). The rest of my career has been spent at non-Linux companies that 
support a large number of different platforms where we looked at tools based 
upon cost-effectiveness and technical capabilities. My current employer is a 
hardware vendor where I work in a group that provides the software component 
of solutions to customer's problems. I just shipped product to a Fortune 5 
company. Believe me, they don't give a flying flip about what license 
individual components in our solution carry. All they care about is the 
license for the entire product, and whether it'll do the job or not in the 
most cost-effective manner.

You and Tom Christianson appear to have an axe to grind when it comes to 
licensing, spreading all sorts of untruths about what various licenses do and 
do not say. Grind away. Expect the rest of us to ignore you. 

'Nuff said.

-- 
Eric Lee Green          GnuPG public key at http://badtux.org/eric/eric.gpg
           mailto:eric / badtux.org  Web: http://www.badtux.org
             You do not save freedom by destroying freedom